NebraskaBeatrice

Beatrice Health and Rehabilitation

1800 Irving Street, Beatrice, NE 68310 · Gage County · 87 certified beds · avg 57 residents/day · certified since Apr 6, 1993

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.18
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 9, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Apr 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Apr 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Apr 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Apr 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough fresh-air ventilation, whether through windows, mechanical systems, or both.
Apr 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Apr 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 3, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
May 3, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
May 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202350F
202470E
202530F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNebraska avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.184.333.95bottom 8% in Nebraska; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.310.720.69bottom 5% in Nebraska; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.803.793.50bottom 7% in Nebraska; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.270.470.48bottom 17% in Nebraska; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)43.548.745.8top 42% in Nebraska; top 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)42.944.142.9top 48% in Nebraska; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.80, RN 0.37, weekend 3.35. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2011
Caretrust GP LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2011
Caretrust Reit INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2011
Ctr Partnership LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2011
Dayton, ElizabethIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/31/2019
Dayton, ElizabethIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/31/2019
Dayton, ElizabethIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/08/2025
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2011
Helenthal, TaraIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2021
Irving Health Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2011
Jorgensen, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Morris, SpencerIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/22/2016
Morris, SpencerIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/08/2025
Port, BarryIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/08/2025
Sato, AmiIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/09/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Good Samaritan Society - Beatrice1.2 miBeatrice, NE★★★☆☆3/5
Gold Crest Retirement Center16.3 miAdams, NE★★★☆☆4/5
Wilber Care Center18.8 miWilber, NE★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Beatrice →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285130.