TexasStephenville

Avir at Stephenville

1670 Lingleville Rd, Stephenville, TX 76401 · Erath County · 102 certified beds · avg 63 residents/day · certified since Mar 16, 1988

Part of chain: AVIR HEALTH GROUP (116 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$204,614
Fines, last 3 years
4.15
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jun 14, 2024 · F-0694

The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.

Why it matters: Improper IV care can cause infections, dehydration, or dangerous fluid imbalances.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Jun 19, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jun 14, 2024 · F-0760

The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Jun 19, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (33)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint
Jun 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Mar 27, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint
Jul 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Apr 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jul 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jul 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jul 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jul 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jun 14, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Jun 14, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Jun 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule.
Jun 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Jun 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jun 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Jun 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Apr 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Apr 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Dec 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · from a complaint
Dec 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Apr 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Apr 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Apr 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380E
2024192K ▲
202530E
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $204,614, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 14, 2024Fine$204,614
Jun 14, 2024Payment Denial15 days from Jul 17, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.153.463.95top 12% in Texas; top 34% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.350.440.69bottom 40% in Texas; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.613.043.50top 13% in Texas; top 37% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.180.340.48bottom 16% in Texas; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)82.355.345.8bottom 12% in Texas; bottom 2% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)90.954.642.9bottom 10% in Texas; bottom 2% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.33, RN 0.28, weekend 2.90. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Stephens Memorial Hospital DistrictOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%02/28/2015
1670 Lingleville Road Opco, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
1670 Lingleville Road Opco, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/22/2025
1670 Lingleville Road Property Owner, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
1670 Lingleville Road Property Owner, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Dagan, AmitaiIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/22/2025
Easley, JamesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Freund, NochumIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Roland, BrianIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/14/2021
Travitsky, AaronIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Welltower INCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Welltower INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Welltower NNN Group, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Welltower NNN Group, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Welltower Op, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Welltower Op, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Zubal, GarryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Lone Star Rehabilitation & Wellness Center0.7 miStephenville, TX★★★★☆4/5
Stephenville Nursing and Rehabilitation1.2 miStephenville, TX★★★★★5/5
De Leon Nursing and Rehabilitation19.2 miDe Leon, TX★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Stephenville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 455744.