WisconsinKing

Wi Veterans Home Moses Hall

210 Cumberlidge Ave, King, WI 54946 · Waupaca County · 192 certified beds · avg 184 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 2015

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$23,520
Fines, last 3 years
6.41
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 20, 2026 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Feb 5, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 17, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 15, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 20, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 14, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 19, 2025 · F-0760

The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 15, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 17, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 20, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Apr 20, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Mar 19, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Mar 19, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Mar 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Mar 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Mar 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 31, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jan 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310D
202440F
202571G ▲
202653J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $23,520.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 20, 2026Fine$23,520

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityWisconsin avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)6.414.293.95top 4% in Wisconsin; top 3% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.281.010.69top 20% in Wisconsin; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.773.843.50top 4% in Wisconsin; top 2% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.720.680.48top 38% in Wisconsin; top 15% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)32.646.945.8top 13% in Wisconsin; top 19% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)19.339.742.9top 17% in Wisconsin; top 13% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.10, RN 1.02, weekend 4.59. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Government - State

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
State of WisconsinOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/01/2014
Bond, JamesIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/09/2023
Bond, JamesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/09/2023
Bond, JamesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/09/2023
Britz, BetteIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/04/2015
Britz, BetteIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/04/2015
Butterfield, BradIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/04/2024
Butterfield, BradIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/04/2024
Cooney, ColtIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/02/2024
Cooney, ColtIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/02/2024
Fay, SusanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/28/2024
Fay, SusanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/28/2024
Fernandez, GinaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/14/2024
Fernandez, GinaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/14/2024
Flack, NicoleIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/15/2020
Flack, NicoleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/15/2020
Kaza, ThanmayiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/31/2023
Kaza, ThanmayiIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/31/2023
Kimball, PollyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/11/2012
Kimball, PollyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/11/2012

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Wi Veterans Hm Ainsworth Hall0.0 miKing, WI★★★★★3/5
Bethany Home2.1 miWaupaca, WI★★★★★4/5
Avina of Weyauwega10.1 miWeyauwega, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Manawa Com Nur Ctr12.3 miManawa, WI★☆☆☆☆2/5
St Joseph Residence18.9 miNew London, WI★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in King →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 525718.