MissouriMaryville

Village Care Center INC

810 East Edwards Street, Maryville, MO 64468 · Nodaway County · 46 certified beds · avg 31 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1996

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: OSBYCORP (2 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$12,735
Fines, last 3 years
4.01
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 23, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 19, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Mar 23, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 28, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Mar 28, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Mar 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Mar 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Mar 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training.
Mar 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Apr 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 11, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping.
Mar 11, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 11, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 11, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 11, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 11, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 11, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 11, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Mar 11, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Mar 11, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 11, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 11, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 11, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2022130E
202430E
2025110F
202621G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $12,735.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 23, 2026Fine$12,735

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.013.663.95top 32% in Missouri; top 39% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.820.490.69top 8% in Missouri; top 26% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.423.223.50top 37% in Missouri; top 46% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.640.330.48top 4% in Missouri; top 20% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)47.156.045.8top 27% in Missouri; bottom 44% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.347.842.9top 26% in Missouri; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.34, RN 0.68, weekend 2.85. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Osby, EdmundIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/1995
Allen, RogerIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/26/2023
BCG Holdings INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Blue Stone Therapy INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2003
Bomar, SallyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2000
Bomar, SallyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/19/2025
Brighton Consulting Group LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Cattail BCG LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Cattail Consulting LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/30/2022
Cattail INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Constant, KatieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/06/2023
Constant, KatieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/19/2025
Ecsi INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Huntsman, AubreyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/21/2024
Iowa Health Care AssociationOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Nutrition Analyst, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2020
Osby Sertterh, JacquelineIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/15/2014
Osby, CharleneIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1997
Osby, EdmundIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Osby, JenniferIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Maryville Rehabilitation & Health Care Center0.6 miMaryville, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Parkdale Manor Health & Rehabilitation1.1 miMaryville, MO★★☆☆☆2/5
Nodaway Healthcare5.1 miMaryville, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Pine View Manor INC19.7 miStanberry, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Maryville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265643.