California ›Sunland

The Hills Healthcare Center

10158 Sunland Blvd, Sunland, CA 91040 · Los Angeles County · 67 certified beds · avg 65 residents/day · certified since Nov 8, 1976

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.67
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (44)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 18, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Dec 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Dec 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Dec 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Dec 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Dec 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Dec 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Dec 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 18, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Oct 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Oct 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Oct 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Oct 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Oct 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Oct 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Oct 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Oct 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Oct 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 24, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
May 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
May 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · from a complaint
May 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Mar 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Nov 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Nov 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Nov 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Nov 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Nov 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Nov 2, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Nov 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (14 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023130E
2024200E
2025110F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.674.313.95top 22% in California; top 19% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.850.610.69top 15% in California; top 24% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.233.903.50top 23% in California; top 17% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.620.510.48top 20% in California; top 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)14.836.745.8top 3% in California; top 1% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)9.138.142.9top 5% in California; top 3% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.14, RN 0.76, weekend 3.75. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Berger, RuthIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest50%06/01/2019
Berger, StevenIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest50%06/01/2019
Sunland Investments, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%06/01/2019
Agesyan, AniIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/22/2022
Agesyan, AniIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/22/2022
Banafsheha, RabieIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2019
Bogikian, AzatIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/03/2019
Bogikian, AzatIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/03/2019
Campos, RosarioIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2019
Campos, RosarioIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2019
Citrus Administrative Services, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2015
Citrus Administrative Services, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2025
Clarizio, DinoIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2007
Clarizio, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2007
Clarizio, OrlandoIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2007
Cortez, RonaldIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/07/2022
Cortez, RonaldIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/07/2022
Ghazarian, MariannaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/06/2017
Ghazarian, MariannaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/06/2017
Sahakyan, NarekIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Sunland Post Acute1.1 miSunland, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
High Valley Lodge1.2 miSunland, CA★★★★★4/5
Totally Kids Specialty Healthcare - Sun Valley2.1 miSun Valley, CA★★★☆☆2/5
North Valley Nursing Center2.3 miTujunga, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Villa Scalabrini Special Care2.5 miSun Valley, CA★★★★☆4/5
Country Manor Healthcare3.3 miLake View Terrace, CA★★★★☆2/5
Pacifica Hospital of the Valley DP SNF3.7 miSun Valley, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Oakpark Healthcare Center4.3 miTujunga, CA★★★★★3/5
All Saints Healthcare Subacute4.6 miNorth Hollywood, CA★★☆☆☆1/5
Maclay Healthcare Center5.3 miSylmar, CA★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Valley Vista Nursing and Transitional Care LLC5.7 miNorth Hollywood, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Vineland Post Acute5.8 miNorth Hollywood, CA★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Sunland →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555045.