Stroud Nursing & Rehab
721 West Olive, Stroud, OK 74079 · Lincoln County · 58 certified beds · avg 46 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1999
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jan 19, 2023 · F-0684
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Feb 16, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jan 19, 2023 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Dec 27, 2022 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 21, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Jun 16, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (17)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Feb 9, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. |
| Feb 9, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. |
| Feb 9, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Feb 9, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. |
| Feb 9, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Jan 19, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Jan 19, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jan 19, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. |
| Jan 19, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. |
| Jan 19, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Jan 19, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jan 19, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
| Jun 22, 2021 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. |
| Jun 22, 2021 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. |
| Jun 22, 2021 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Jun 22, 2021 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 5).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 7 | 2 | J ▲ |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $9,307.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2025 | Fine | $9,307 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Oklahoma avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.03 | 4.58 | 3.95 | top 26% in Oklahoma; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.69 | bottom 45% in Oklahoma; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.90 | 4.16 | 3.50 | top 16% in Oklahoma; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.48 | bottom 48% in Oklahoma; bottom 21% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 0.0 | 55.5 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 53.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.97, RN 0.28, weekend 3.87. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Montgomery, Aubrey | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 05/01/2023 |
| Aldrich, Ryan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Aldrich, Ryan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Interhealth, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Interhealth, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Montgomery, Aubrey | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Montgomery, Aubrey | Individual | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Montgomery, Bradford | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Montgomery, Bradford | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| RCB Bank | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| RCB Bank | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Stroud Re Property Holdings, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Stroud Re Property Holdings, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Wilson, Catherine | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Wilson, Catherine | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Wilson, Catherine | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
- "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chandler Therapy & Living Center LLC | 10.9 mi | Chandler, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Linwood Village Nursing & Retirement Apts | 15.1 mi | Cushing, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Drumright Nursing Home | 17.0 mi | Drumright, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Rainbow Health Care Community and Rainbow Assisted | 18.1 mi | Bristow, OK | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Parkland Manor Living Center | 18.3 mi | Prague, OK | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375367.