How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
409 S 3rd St, Strasburg, ND 58573 (opens Google Maps) · Emmons County · (701) 336-2651· 30 certified beds · avg 27 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1978 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Apr 1, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 1, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Jan 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Jan 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Jan 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Jan 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Jan 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jan 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jan 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Jan 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Jan 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jan 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jan 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | North Dakota avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 6.25 | 5.15 | 3.95 | top 10% in North Dakota; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.74 | 1.09 | 0.69 | top 6% in North Dakota; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.24 | 4.43 | 3.50 | top 13% in North Dakota; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.95 | 0.59 | 0.48 | top 6% in North Dakota; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.0 | 48.8 | 45.8 | top 48% in North Dakota; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 42.9 | 40.3 | 42.9 | bottom 42% in North Dakota; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.49, RN 1.25, weekend 3.76.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.49 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Strasburg Nursing Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strasburg Nursing Home | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/1966 |
| Christman, Marlene | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/24/2026 |
| Christman, Marlene | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/24/2026 |
| Compaan, Brenda | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/1995 |
| Compaan, Brenda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/1995 |
| Lang, Todd | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/22/2009 |
| Lang, Todd | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/22/2009 |
| Langeliers, Tim | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2016 |
| Langeliers, Tim | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2016 |
| Linton Hospital | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/24/2023 |
| Linton Hospital | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2025 |
| Loggins, Tony | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| Loggins, Tony | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| Meier, Al | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/22/2009 |
| Meier, Al | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/30/2017 |
| Meyer, Linda | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/17/2024 |
| Meyer, Linda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/17/2024 |
| Ohlhauser, Heidi | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/29/2012 |
| Ohlhauser, Heidi | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/29/2012 |
| Sheckler, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/19/2022 |
Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wishek Living Center | 29.8 mi | Wishek, ND | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Wentz Living Center | 31.5 mi | Napoleon, ND | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Avera Eureka Health Care Center | 36.6 mi | Eureka, SD | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Ashley Medical Center Nursing Home | 38.4 mi | Ashley, ND | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 355049.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details