IowaSpencer

St Luke Lutheran Nursing Home

1301 Saint Luke Drive, Spencer, IA 51301 · Clay County · 79 certified beds · avg 73 residents/day · certified since Jul 7, 2003

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$90,076
Fines, last 3 years
4.62
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 4, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 17, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Aug 22, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 5, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 4, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Sep 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
Sep 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Sep 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Sep 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Sep 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Sep 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Sep 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 22, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Aug 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Aug 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Aug 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Aug 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Apr 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Aug 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Aug 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Aug 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Aug 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340D
2024111J ▲
202591J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $90,076, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 4, 2025Fine$81,679
Aug 22, 2024Fine$8,397
Aug 22, 2024Payment Denial21 days from Sep 20, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIowa avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.624.373.95top 35% in Iowa; top 20% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.060.850.69top 22% in Iowa; top 13% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.283.863.50top 25% in Iowa; top 16% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.650.510.48top 20% in Iowa; top 20% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)44.144.045.8bottom 44% in Iowa; top 48% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)21.442.142.9top 23% in Iowa; top 16% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.71, RN 0.85, weekend 3.44. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
BCG Holdings INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Brighton Consulting Group LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Cattail BCG LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Cattail INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Chindlund, KatieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/22/2018
Clausen, JerryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2015
Ecsi INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
GCS Tech INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Halverson, GaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2017
Hoye, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/04/2023
Hughes, MaryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/28/1992
Hunziker, KennethIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/19/2010
Hunziker, KennethIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/02/2025
Iowa Health Care AssociationOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Jacobsen, JennaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Kading, DougIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/04/2023
Klein, AmandaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/20/2010
Koenecke, MikeIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/04/2023
Kruse, JaneIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2018
Mechler, DeborahIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation Center2.2 miSpencer, IA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Ruthven Community Care Center11.5 miRuthven, IA★★★★☆4/5
Accura Healthcare of Milford14.2 miMilford, IA★★★★☆5/5
Community Memorial Health Center18.5 miHartley, IA★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Spencer →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 165484.