IowaMarshalltown

Southridge Specialty Care

309 West Merle Hibbs Blvd., Marshalltown, IA 50158 · Marshall County · 82 certified beds · avg 71 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1994 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: CARE INITIATIVES (43 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$45,406
Fines, last 3 years
3.90
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Sep 26, 2024 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Sep 27, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 5, 2024 · F-0697 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 18, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · from a complaint
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 5, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Nov 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Nov 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Nov 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · from a complaint
Sep 26, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Sep 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jun 20, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Jun 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jun 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Mar 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Mar 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380D
2024112K ▲
202560D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $45,406, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 26, 2024Fine$45,406
Sep 26, 2024Payment Denial25 days from Oct 24, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIowa avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.904.373.95bottom 31% in Iowa; top 44% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.770.850.69bottom 46% in Iowa; top 30% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.403.863.50bottom 29% in Iowa; top 47% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.500.510.48top 41% in Iowa; top 33% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)29.244.045.8top 16% in Iowa; top 13% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)36.442.142.9top 44% in Iowa; top 40% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.65, RN 0.72, weekend 3.18. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Care InitiativesOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%03/01/2014
Beal, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2020
Beal, MichaelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2020
Bowen, LaneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Carothers, Mary JaneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Childs, KevinIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Computershare Corporate Trust Company, NaOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Computershare Corporate Trust Company, NaOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2025
Corless, PeterIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Dixon, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2016
Drake, EmilyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/04/2023
Gijima, DesireIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Gijima, DesireIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Gilyard, TanyaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/23/2025
Krein, KeithIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/29/2022
Kuhn, JeramyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/25/2008
Mahler, CarlaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
McDyer, JessicaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/22/2023
Rust, ElizabethIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Spina, DylanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Accura Healthcare of Marshalltown0.3 miMarshalltown, IA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Harmony Marshalltown1.4 miMarshalltown, IA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Iowa Veterans Home2.9 miMarshalltown, IA★★★★★5/5
State Center Specialty Care13.1 miState Center, IA★★★★★3/5
Oakview Nursing Home14.8 miConrad, IA★★★★☆4/5
Westbrook Acres15.5 miGladbrook, IA★★☆☆☆3/5
Accura Healthcare of Toledo17.0 miToledo, IA★★★☆☆4/5
Sunny Hill Care Center17.4 miTama, IA★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Marshalltown →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 165209.