North CarolinaBurnsville

Smoky Ridge Health and Rehabilitation

310 Pensacola Road, Burnsville, NC 28714 · Yancey County · 140 certified beds · avg 101 residents/day · certified since Jun 29, 1989

Part of chain: BRIGHTON HEALTHCARE (8 facilities, chain avg rating 1.5★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$59,631
Fines, last 3 years
2.95
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 20, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 5, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jun 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not notify the appropriate authorities when a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability had a significant change in condition.
Mar 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Mar 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Mar 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not notify the appropriate authorities when a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability had a significant change in condition.
Mar 20, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023140F
202411G ▲
202550D
202620E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $59,631.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 20, 2024Fine$59,631

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNorth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.954.013.95bottom 5% in North Carolina; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.720.640.69top 25% in North Carolina; top 34% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.633.563.50bottom 6% in North Carolina; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.600.410.48top 15% in North Carolina; top 23% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)51.649.045.8bottom 43% in North Carolina; bottom 33% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)13.345.742.9top 6% in North Carolina; top 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.08, RN 0.75, weekend 2.75. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
CTNC Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest38%06/11/2025
Etnc Holdings LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
Fischer, DavidIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest29%06/11/2025
Lefkowitz, ZevIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest29%06/11/2025
Treff, CynthiaIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest38%06/11/2025
Treff, EstherIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
310 Pensacola Rd LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2022
310 Pensacola Rd LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2022
Brighton Management LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2022
CTNC Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2022
Fischer, DavidIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2022
Fischer, DavidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2022
Fischer, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2022
Lefkowitz, ZevIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2022
Shade, CarlaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2022
Shade, CarlaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2022
Treff, CynthiaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2022
Turbett, TimothyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/13/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Greens at Spruce Pines11.4 miSpruce Pine, NC★★★☆☆3/5
Madison Health and Rehabilitation14.3 miMars Hill, NC★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Erwin Health Care Center16.7 miErwin, TN★★☆☆☆2/5
Center on Aging and Health16.8 miErwin, TN★★★☆☆3/5
Christian Care Center of Unicoi County16.8 miErwin, TN★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Burnsville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345305.