2809 Denny Avenue, Pascagoula, MS 39581 (opens Google Maps) · Jackson County · (228) 809-5060· 54 certified beds · avg 24 residents/day · certified since Sep 23, 2017 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jan 13, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Dec 19, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jan 13, 2025 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Dec 19, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Sep 19, 2024 · F-0656
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 2, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Sep 19, 2024 · F-0690
The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Why it matters: Poor continence and catheter care leads to infections, skin breakdown, and loss of dignity.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 2, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 10 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint F-0656
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 13, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Jan 13, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Sep 19, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Sep 19, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Sep 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Sep 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Sep 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Sep 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 6 | 2 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 3 | 2 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
4 fines totaling $31,437.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2025 | Fine | $11,462 |
| Jan 13, 2025 | Fine | $11,463 |
| Sep 19, 2024 | Fine | $4,256 |
| Sep 19, 2024 | Fine | $4,256 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Mississippi avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 8.29 | 4.88 | 3.95 | top 2% in Mississippi; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 3.18 | 0.74 | 0.69 | top 1% in Mississippi; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 6.33 | 4.09 | 3.50 | top 2% in Mississippi; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.95 | 0.38 | 0.48 | top 1% in Mississippi; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 57.1 | 45.7 | 45.8 | bottom 18% in Mississippi; bottom 21% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 54.5 | 38.4 | 42.9 | bottom 23% in Mississippi; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 8.11, RN 3.11, weekend 6.20.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (8.11 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Singing River Skilled Nursing Facility. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - City/county
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Singing River Health System | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 09/23/2017 |
| McNeil, Jason | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/02/2021 |
| McNeil, Jason | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/02/2021 |
| McNeil, Jason | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/02/2021 |
| Roth, Randy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/23/2017 |
| Roth, Randy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/23/2017 |
| Singing River Health System | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/23/2017 |
| St. Pe', Laurin | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/02/2023 |
| St. Pe', Laurin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/02/2023 |
| St. Pe', Laurin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/02/2023 |
| Stevens, Thomas | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/23/2017 |
All 11 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plaza Community Living Center | 0.2 mi | Pascagoula, MS | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Diversicare of Moss Point | 1.0 mi | Moss Point, MS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| River Chase Village | 7.7 mi | Gautier, MS | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Sunplex Sub-Acute Center | 11.6 mi | Ocean Springs, MS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Ocean Springs Health & Rehabilitation Center | 12.2 mi | Ocean Springs, MS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Greenway Health and Rehabilitation Center, LLC | 14.4 mi | Grand Bay, AL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 255346.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details