Sibley Mem Hosp Renaissance

Name: Sibley Mem Hosp Renaissance
Address: 5255 LOUGHBORO ROAD NW, Washington, DC, 20016, US
Telephone: 2025374000

5255 Loughboro Road NW, Washington, DC 20016 · The District County · 45 certified beds · avg 31 residents/day · certified since May 27, 1994

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$8,827

Fines, last 3 years

5.61

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 6, 2024 · F-0740 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.

Why it matters: A resident's untreated mental health needs can worsen and take a toll on their physical health too.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 4, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 23, 2021 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 22, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (34)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Aug 14, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Aug 14, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · from a complaint
Aug 14, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2024	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Jan 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Jan 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Jan 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Jan 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Apr 23, 2021	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 23, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 23, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Apr 23, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings.
Apr 23, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Apr 23, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 23, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 23, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 13, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Sep 13, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 13, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 13, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Sep 13, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 13, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Sep 13, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Sep 13, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 12).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2019	8	0	E
2021	8	1	G ▲
2023	12	0	E
2024	6	1	J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,827.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Feb 6, 2024	Fine	$8,827

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	District of Columbia avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	5.61	4.76	3.95	top 27% in District of Columbia; top 6% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	3.82	1.48	0.69	top 7% in District of Columbia; top 1% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.93	4.35	3.50	top 27% in District of Columbia; top 7% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	3.61	1.28	0.48	top 7% in District of Columbia; top 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	26.0	34.0	45.8	top 27% in District of Columbia; top 8% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	18.2	32.5	42.9	top 7% in District of Columbia; top 12% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 6.48, RN 4.41, weekend 5.69. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Other

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	11/01/2010
Abele, Jennifer	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2020
Abele, Jennifer	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2020
Ammerman, Joshua	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	12/09/2013
Ammerman, Joshua	Individual	Trustee of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/09/2013
Argo, Archie	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/22/2004
Argo, Archie	Individual	Trustee of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/22/2004
Barron, Jessica	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2024
Barron, Jessica	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2024
Barton, William	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	05/23/1997
Barton, William	Individual	Trustee of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/23/1997
Bulen, James	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2024
Bulen, James	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2024
Carpenter, Carolyn	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	08/24/2020
Carpenter, Carolyn	Individual	Trustee of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/24/2020
Cecil, Guy	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2023
Cecil, Guy	Individual	Trustee of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2023
Cernea, Andrei	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2021
Cernea, Andrei	Individual	Trustee of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2021
Crickenberger, Brian	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What mental health services do you provide on-site, and who delivers them?"
"How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
"If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
"Does a pharmacist review every resident's medications and chart monthly, and how are their concerns acted on?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"Who provides social services here, and how would they support my family member's emotional and social needs?"
"How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
"How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Lisner Louise Dickson Hurthome	2.3 mi	Washington, DC	★★★★★	5/5
Forest Hills of DC	2.5 mi	Washington, DC	★★★★★	4/5
Arleigh Burke Pavilion	2.6 mi	MC Lean, VA	★★★★★	4/5
Cherrydale Health & Rehabilitation Center	2.7 mi	Arlington, VA	★★☆☆☆	1/5
Ingleside at Rock Creek	3.1 mi	Washington, DC	★★★☆☆	3/5
Vierra Falls Church	3.5 mi	Falls Church, VA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Stoddard Baptist Nursing Home	3.6 mi	Washington, DC	★★★☆☆	3/5
Inspire Rehabilitation and Health Center LLC	3.8 mi	Washington, DC	★★★☆☆	3/5
The Jefferson	3.8 mi	Arlington, VA	★★☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Knollwood HSC	3.9 mi	Washington, DC	★★★★☆	3/5
Carriage Hill Bethesda	4.8 mi	Bethesda, MD	★★★☆☆	3/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Chevy Chase	4.9 mi	Chevy Chase, MD	★★★☆☆	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Washington →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 095030.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Sibley Mem Hosp Renaissance

5255 Loughboro Road NW, Washington, DC 20016 · 2025374000

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 5/5· Fines (3y): $8,827

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Feb 6, 2024 (F-0740, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
▲ Apr 23, 2021 (F-0686, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What mental health services do you provide on-site, and who delivers them?"
☐ "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
☐ "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
☐ "Does a pharmacist review every resident's medications and chart monthly, and how are their concerns acted on?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "Who provides social services here, and how would they support my family member's emotional and social needs?"
☐ "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
☐ "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 095030 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)