How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
331 West 25th Street, Jasper, AL 35502 (opens Google Maps) · Walker County · (205) 384-9086· 107 certified beds · avg 97 residents/day · certified since Dec 29, 1970 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 9, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Feb 9, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role. · F-0551 |
| Feb 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552 |
| Feb 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · F-0553 |
| Feb 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Feb 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Feb 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Feb 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 9, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. · F-0576 |
| Feb 9, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Feb 9, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Aug 1, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 1, 2019 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jun 26, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 13).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2019 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 13 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Alabama avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.51 | 4.43 | 3.95 | top 45% in Alabama; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.69 | top 40% in Alabama; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.59 | 3.73 | 3.50 | bottom 39% in Alabama; top 38% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.48 | top 39% in Alabama; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.4 | 46.9 | 45.8 | top 39% in Alabama; top 49% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.0 | 39.5 | 42.9 | top 24% in Alabama; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.04, RN 0.68, weekend 3.21.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.04 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Shadescrest Health Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| King, Janet | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 05/18/2018 |
| Stout, Jerry | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 05/18/2018 |
| Davis, Richard | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1997 |
| Davis, Richard | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1997 |
| Estill, Jennifer | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Estill, Jennifer | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Free, Joyce | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/1990 |
| Free, Joyce | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/1990 |
| Frye, Jean | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2020 |
| Frye, Jean | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2020 |
| Harrison, Boyde | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Harrison, Boyde | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Kenyon, Amanda | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Kenyon, Amanda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| King, Janet | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/18/2018 |
| Kolb, Sarah | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Kolb, Sarah | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Mitchell Kelley, Kimberly | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2011 |
| Mitchell Kelley, Kimberly | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2011 |
| Mumpower, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/16/2015 |
Showing 20 of 35 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 15 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ridgewood Health Services, INC. | 2.0 mi | Jasper, AL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Ridgeview Health Services, INC | 2.5 mi | Jasper, AL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cordova Health and Rehabilitation, LLC | 6.9 mi | Cordova, AL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Walker Rehabilitation Center, INC | 14.7 mi | Carbon Hill, AL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 015114.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details