New YorkStamford

Robinson Terrace

28652 State Highway 23, Stamford, NY 12167 · Delaware County · 120 certified beds · avg 114 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1967

Part of chain: UPSTATE SERVICES GROUP (17 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.36
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 13, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Feb 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Feb 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Feb 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Mar 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 20, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 20, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 20, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Oct 20, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Oct 20, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Oct 20, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.
Oct 20, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202070E
202330E
202660E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.363.583.95bottom 47% in New York; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.470.680.69bottom 28% in New York; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.783.133.50bottom 36% in New York; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.240.480.48bottom 24% in New York; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)50.540.345.8bottom 25% in New York; bottom 36% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)37.539.842.9top 49% in New York; top 42% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.09, RN 0.43, weekend 2.55. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Camerota, DavidIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2018
Koenig, UriIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest60%05/01/2018
Steif, EfraimIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest40%05/01/2018
Bender, BridgetIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2021
Bender, BridgetIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2021
Camerota, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2018
Jaganathan, DaisyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/02/2025
Jaganathan, DaisyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/02/2025
Koenig, UriIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2018
Koenig, UriIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/10/2017
Steif, EfraimIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/10/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Mountainside Residential Care Center18.5 miMargaretville, NY★★☆☆☆2/5
Delhi Rehabilitation and Nursing Center19.5 miDelhi, NY★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 2 closest →

All facilities in Stamford →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335236.