213 East Main Street, New Bloomfield, PA 17068 (opens Google Maps) · Perry County · (717) 582-4346· 118 certified beds · avg 107 residents/day · certified since Jan 18, 1979 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 8, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 25, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. F-0730
The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint F-0627
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| Sep 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint · F-0627 |
| Dec 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Dec 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Dec 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Dec 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals. · F-0810 |
| Dec 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| May 8, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 10, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jan 10, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Jan 10, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Jan 10, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · F-0790 |
| Jan 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Jan 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jan 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jan 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $8,018.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2024 | Fine | $8,018 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.49 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 42% in Pennsylvania; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.61 | 0.80 | 0.69 | bottom 43% in Pennsylvania; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.13 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 38% in Pennsylvania; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.33 | 0.56 | 0.48 | bottom 30% in Pennsylvania; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 42.5 | 44.5 | 45.8 | top 43% in Pennsylvania; top 43% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 70.0 | 39.9 | 42.9 | bottom 7% in Pennsylvania; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.22, RN 0.56, weekend 2.88.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.22 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Premier at Perry Village for Nursing and Rehab, LL. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| El Buckeye East LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 25% | 09/18/2017 |
| Gamzeh, Kathleen | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 25% | 09/18/2017 |
| Glatzer, Akiva | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 25% | 09/18/2017 |
| Premier Members | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 09/18/2017 |
| 213 E Main Street Propco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2017 |
| Brandt, Suzette | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2017 |
| Brandt, Suzette | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/07/2025 |
| Clinical Consulting Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Clinical Consulting Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/14/2025 |
| Creps, Steven | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2017 |
| Creps, Steven | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/14/2025 |
| Glatzer, Akiva | Individual | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2017 |
| Priority Care Group LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Schaffer, Daniel | Individual | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2017 |
| Summation Financial Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Summation Financial Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/14/2025 |
All 16 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stonebridge Health & Rehabilitation Center | 6.0 mi | Duncannon, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Transitions Healthcare Allens Cove | 8.9 mi | Duncannon, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Claremont Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 14.5 mi | Carlisle, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Letort Spring Nursing and Rehab LLC | 14.6 mi | Carlisle, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Northern Dauphin Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 15.1 mi | Millersburg, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Sarah a Todd Memorial Home | 15.4 mi | Carlisle, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Locust Grove Retirement Village | 15.5 mi | Mifflin, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Thornwald Home | 16.0 mi | Carlisle, PA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Chapel Pointe at Carlisle | 16.0 mi | Carlisle, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Forest Park Nursing and Rehabilitation | 16.0 mi | Carlisle, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Brookline Nursing and Rehab | 16.1 mi | Mifflintown, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Carlisle Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 16.2 mi | Carlisle, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395426.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details