MichiganFarwell

North Woods Nursing Center

2532 Cadillac Drive, Farwell, MI 48622 · Clare County · 71 certified beds · avg 64 residents/day · certified since Nov 2, 1987

Part of chain: THE PEPLINSKI GROUP (10 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.47
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 8, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 8, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Apr 8, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Apr 8, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 8, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Apr 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Oct 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Oct 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · from a complaint
Oct 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 27, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Mar 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202470E
202520E
202670F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.474.323.95top 31% in Michigan; top 24% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.820.840.69top 45% in Michigan; top 26% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.113.793.50top 24% in Michigan; top 20% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.420.490.48bottom 48% in Michigan; top 45% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)58.544.145.8bottom 12% in Michigan; bottom 19% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.339.242.9top 38% in Michigan; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.08, RN 0.75, weekend 3.76. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ackerman, AmyIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%01/01/2012
Ackerman, RickyIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%01/01/2012
Baumgarten, MichaelIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%01/01/2012
Baumgarten, ThereseIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%01/01/2012
Peplinski, SheliIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%01/01/2012
Peplinski, ToddIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%01/01/2012
Schade, JefferyIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%01/01/2012
Schade, TamaraIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%01/01/2012
Thompson, BrianIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%01/01/2012
Thompson, ShellyIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%01/01/2012
Ackerman, AmyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Ackerman, RickyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Ackerman, RickyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Ackerman, RickyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Baumgarten, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Baumgarten, ThereseIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
NWNC Estates, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Painter, DawnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/10/2023
Painter, DawnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/10/2023
Peplinski, SheliIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Medilodge of Clare7.7 miClare, MI★★★★★4/5
Medilodge of Mt. Pleasant18.7 miMt. Pleasant, MI★★★☆☆3/5
The Laurels of Mt. Pleasant19.2 miMt. Pleasant, MI★★★★★4/5
Isabella County Medical Care Facility19.2 miMt. Pleasant, MI★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Farwell →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235464.