NebraskaKearney

Mother Hull Home

125 East 23rd Street, Kearney, NE 68847 · Buffalo County · 58 certified beds · avg 45 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 2003

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.57
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 9, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Feb 9, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Feb 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Feb 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Dec 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Dec 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340E
202450E
202680F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNebraska avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.574.333.95top 8% in Nebraska; top 7% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.580.720.69bottom 35% in Nebraska; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.703.793.50top 12% in Nebraska; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.240.470.48bottom 12% in Nebraska; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)97.248.745.8bottom 1% in Nebraska; bottom 1% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)85.744.142.9bottom 6% in Nebraska; bottom 3% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.85, RN 0.50, weekend 4.09. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Brauer, SiegIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/17/2010
Cooper, SharonIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/20/2003
Hays, RandallIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/18/2007
Simmons, StephanieIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE11/13/2008
Simmons, StephanieIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/20/2008
Smith, AnitaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/20/2002
Smith, BrendaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2012
Smith, BrendaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2014
Standage, MonteIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2014

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Mt Carmel Home - Keens Memorial0.6 miKearney, NE★★★★☆4/5
Good Samaritan Society - St John's0.8 miKearney, NE★★☆☆☆2/5
Good Samaritan Society - St Luke's Village1.5 miKearney, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5
Brookestone Gardens2.2 miKearney, NE★★★★★3/5
Bethany Home, INC15.4 miMinden, NE★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Kearney →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285254.