MissouriChillicothe

Morningside Center

1700 Morningside Drive, Chillicothe, MO 64601 · Livingston County · 60 certified beds · avg 53 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 2007

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.61
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 14, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 14, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jun 2, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Jun 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jun 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202350F
202570E
2026101G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.613.663.95top 17% in Missouri; top 20% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.220.490.69top 2% in Missouri; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.973.223.50top 18% in Missouri; top 24% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.720.330.48top 3% in Missouri; top 15% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)50.756.045.8top 35% in Missouri; bottom 35% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)23.147.842.9top 18% in Missouri; top 18% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.71, RN 0.98, weekend 3.19. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

Government - County

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Livingston County Nursing Home DistrictOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/22/2007
Cady, ScottIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/09/2025
Corbin, LugenisIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/09/2020
Hughes, DarleneIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/17/2025
Jones, ConnieIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/17/2016
Jones, ConnieIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/17/2016
Lewis, JodinaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Lewis, JodinaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Livingston County Nursing Home DistrictOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/22/2007
Melte, Harri AnnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Melte, Harri AnnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Midwest Physical Therapy PCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/04/2013
Rardon, SharonIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2014
Sensenich, GregoryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Sensenich, GregoryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2013
Thompson, DebraIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/17/2025
Usda Rural DevelopmentOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/22/2007
Washburn, CharlesIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/23/2024
Winfrey, RobertIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/22/2007

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Grand River Health Care0.4 miChillicothe, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Stonebridge Chillicothe0.7 miChillicothe, MO★★★★★5/5
Livingston Manor Care Center0.9 miChillicothe, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Eastview Manor Care Center19.9 miTrenton, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Sunnyview Nursing Home & Apartments19.9 miTrenton, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Chillicothe →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265813.