CaliforniaSanta Barbara

Mission Park Healthcare Center

623 West Junipero Street, Santa Barbara, CA 93105 · Santa Barbara County · 138 certified beds · avg 127 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1969

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.69
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (14)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Sep 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · from a complaint
Sep 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
May 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jan 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Dec 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Aug 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jan 21, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 2, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201910D
202210D
202340D
202480D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.694.313.95top 22% in California; top 19% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.270.610.69bottom 8% in California; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.183.903.50top 24% in California; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.210.510.48bottom 12% in California; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)42.536.745.8bottom 31% in California; top 43% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)60.038.142.9bottom 16% in California; bottom 22% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.77, RN 0.27, weekend 4.25. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ahm TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%08/09/2021
Mayer, AaronIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/09/2021
623 W. Junipero, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/09/2021
Ahm TrustOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/09/2021
Keawekane, ScottIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/11/2022
Larson, QuinnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/11/2024
Larson, QuinnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/11/2024
Mayer PP Associates, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/09/2021
Mayer, AaronIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/09/2021
Mayer, AaronIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/09/2021
Mayer, HeleneIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/09/2021
Mayer, RonaldIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/09/2021
Murdoch, JamesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/02/2023
Murdoch, JamesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/02/2023
Pacificare Health Management LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/09/2021
The Compliance Institute LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2023
The Compliance Institute LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Samarkand Skilled Nursing Facility0.2 miSanta Barbara, CA★★★★★5/5
The Californian0.6 miSanta Barbara, CA★★★★★5/5
Valle Verde Health Facility1.2 miSanta Barbara, CA★★★★★4/5
Channel Islands Post Acute1.5 miSanta Barbara, CA★★★☆☆4/5
Buena Vista Care Center4.6 miSanta Barbara, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Casa Dorinda5.1 miSanta Barbara, CA★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Santa Barbara →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055991.