How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
300 Hwy 556/Route 2 Box 66, Meadville, MS 39653 (opens Google Maps) · Franklin County · (601) 773-7778· 60 certified beds · avg 42 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 1995 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CAVALIER HEALTHCARE (4 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not honor a resident's right to choose their own attending doctor. Residents get to decide which physician oversees their care. · from a complaint F-0555
The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint F-0552
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor a resident's right to choose their own attending doctor. Residents get to decide which physician oversees their care. · from a complaint · F-0555 |
| Nov 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint · F-0552 |
| Aug 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Aug 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Aug 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Aug 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 31, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 31, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Mississippi avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.49 | 4.88 | 3.95 | top 23% in Mississippi; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.69 | top 31% in Mississippi; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.20 | 4.09 | 3.50 | top 32% in Mississippi; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.52 | 0.38 | 0.48 | top 14% in Mississippi; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 34.0 | 45.7 | 45.8 | top 20% in Mississippi; top 22% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 16.7 | 38.4 | 42.9 | top 18% in Mississippi; top 9% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.94, RN 0.71, weekend 3.77.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.94 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Meadville Convalescent Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guins, George | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 12/26/2001 |
| Meadville LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 12/26/2001 |
| Guins, George | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/19/2008 |
| Hornsby, Albert | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/06/2014 |
All 4 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Cavalier Healthcare — 4 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jefferson County Nursing Home | 20.6 mi | Fayette, MS | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Liberty Community Living Ctr | 20.8 mi | Liberty, MS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Silver Cross Health & Rehab | 26.3 mi | Brookhaven, MS | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Trend Health and Rehab of Brookhaven | 26.5 mi | Brookhaven, MS | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Diversicare of Brookhaven | 26.5 mi | Brookhaven, MS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Haven Hall Health Care Center | 27.3 mi | Brookhaven, MS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Wilkinson County Senior Care | 27.6 mi | Centreville, MS | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Camellia Estates | 27.7 mi | McComb, MS | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| McComb Community Care Center | 27.8 mi | McComb, MS | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Courtyard Health and Rehabilitation | 30.0 mi | McComb, MS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Trend Health and Rehab of Natchez, LLC | 30.6 mi | Natchez, MS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Grand Trace Health and Rehabilitation | 30.8 mi | Natchez, MS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 255213.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details