CaliforniaStockton

Meadowood a Health and Rehabilitation Center

3110 Wagner Heights Road, Stockton, CA 95209 · San Joaquin County · 100 certified beds · avg 63 residents/day · certified since Oct 10, 1997

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.27
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (38)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Feb 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Oct 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · from a complaint
Apr 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Apr 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jul 15, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 15, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 15, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jul 15, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 15, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Jul 15, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 15, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jul 15, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 15, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jul 15, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2022100F
2024150E
2025120E
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.274.313.95top 11% in California; top 10% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.960.610.69top 12% in California; top 17% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.743.903.50top 9% in California; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.590.510.48top 23% in California; top 24% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)28.736.745.8top 26% in California; top 12% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)41.238.142.9bottom 42% in California; top 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.20, RN 0.95, weekend 4.68. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
O'Connor Woods Housing CorporationOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%02/02/1988
Amx Holdings, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/25/2021
Chan, AlexanderIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/16/2016
Chan, AlexanderIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/16/2016
Croce, RudolphIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Croce, RudolphIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Croce, RudolphIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Cromwell, KristinIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Cromwell, KristinIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Donovan, ElizabethIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Donovan, ElizabethIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Eskaton Properties IncorporatedOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2014
Eskaton Properties IncorporatedOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
Mallette, PennyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Mallette, PennyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Mallette, PennyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Meyer, LouisIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Meyer, LouisIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Moss Adams LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
O'Connor Woods Housing CorporationOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/10/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Crystal Creek Post-Acute0.6 miStockton, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Creekside Center1.6 miStockton, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Delta Oaks Post Acute2.5 miStockton, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Crestwood Manor - 1043.7 miStockton, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Brookside Care Center3.8 miStockton, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Clearwater Healthcare Center3.9 miStockton, CA★★☆☆☆1/5
Oak Grove Post Acute4.2 miStockton, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Riverwood Health Care4.2 miStockton, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Fulton Gardens Post Acute, LLC5.0 miStockton, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Noble Care Center5.4 miStockton, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Hampton Post Acute5.5 miStockton, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Good Samaritan Rehab and Care Center5.6 miStockton, CA★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Stockton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555713.