OklahomaLawton

McMahon-Tomlinson Nursing Center

2007 NW 52nd Street, Lawton, OK 73505 · Comanche County · 142 certified beds · avg 129 residents/day · certified since Jun 19, 2014

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$6,338
Fines, last 3 years
4.49
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 16, 2025 · F-0600

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 23, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 16, 2025 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 23, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 25, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Dec 16, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Dec 16, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Mar 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Mar 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Mar 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Mar 3, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Mar 3, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.
Mar 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330E
2024110E
202552G ▲
202640E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $6,338.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 16, 2025Fine$6,338

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.494.583.95bottom 47% in Oklahoma; top 23% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.200.410.69bottom 10% in Oklahoma; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.174.163.50top 48% in Oklahoma; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.120.280.48bottom 5% in Oklahoma; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.055.545.8
RN turnover (%)0.053.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.05, RN 0.18, weekend 3.77. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Comanche County Hospital AuthorityOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/13/1971
Fitch, NatalieIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2021
Fitch, NatalieIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Forrest, StacyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/09/2022
Forrest, StacyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/09/2022
Henry, MarkIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Jones, RobertIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE06/19/2014
Jones, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/19/2014
Kruger, GeorgeIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE08/03/2015
Kruger, GeorgeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/03/2015
Kruger, GeorgeIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/03/2015
Legako, EdwardIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/17/2016
Legako, EdwardIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
McCall, CharlesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/13/2020
McCall, CharlesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Smith, BrentIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2014
Smith, BrentIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2014
Smith, BrentIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2014
Zelbst, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/1997

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Montevista Rehabilitation and Skilled Care1.3 miLawton, OK★★★☆☆3/5
Willow Park Health Care Center1.4 miLawton, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5
Lawton Post Acute & Rehab3.0 miLawton, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lawton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375562.