MinnesotaFairmont

Lakeview Methodist Health Care Center

610 Summit Drive, Fairmont, MN 56031 · Martin County · 72 certified beds · avg 67 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1985

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.76
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 19, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Nov 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Nov 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Nov 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Nov 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Nov 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Oct 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Oct 24, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Dec 6, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 6, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Dec 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Dec 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Dec 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Dec 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Dec 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023100F
202490E
202570E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.764.833.95top 13% in Minnesota; top 5% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.901.220.69bottom 22% in Minnesota; top 21% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.964.273.50top 16% in Minnesota; top 7% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.250.690.48bottom 4% in Minnesota; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)36.542.245.8top 39% in Minnesota; top 28% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)25.038.642.9top 27% in Minnesota; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.77, RN 0.75, weekend 4.11. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Adams, JeffIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Bachenberg, TimothyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Barnes, DeborahIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2014
Barnes, DeborahIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2014
Barnes, DeborahIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Barnes, DeborahIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/06/2024
Barnes, DeborahIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/08/2025
Edmundson, BrandonIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Green, JeffreyIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Green, JeffreyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Green, JeffreyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/06/2024
Green, JeffreyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/08/2025
Haugen, CharlesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Haugen, CharlesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Lund, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2013
Musser, BradleyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2014
Musser, BradleyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Nordstrom, NancyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Subbert, JasonIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Tumbleson, MelissaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Truman Senior Living13.1 miTruman, MN★★★★★4/5
Valley Vue Care Center17.1 miArmstrong, IA★★★★★4/5
St Lukes Lutheran Care Center18.9 miBlue Earth, MN★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Fairmont →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245280.