TexasFredericksburg

Knopp Healthcare and Rehab Center INC

1208 N Llano, Fredericksburg, TX 78624 · Gillespie County · 119 certified beds · avg 59 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1976

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.50
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Jan 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Jan 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Jan 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jan 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Oct 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint
Oct 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Oct 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Oct 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Oct 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Oct 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Oct 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Aug 24, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Aug 24, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not give all staff the required training on its quality improvement program — the internal system for finding problems and making care better.
Aug 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Aug 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Aug 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202390F
2024100E
202660E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.503.463.95top 35% in Texas; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.530.440.69top 23% in Texas; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.383.043.50top 20% in Texas; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.380.340.48top 28% in Texas; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)47.855.345.8top 40% in Texas; bottom 42% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.054.642.9top 1% in Texas; top 1% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.15, RN 0.47, weekend 3.04. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Luchenbach, JayIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest29%01/01/2013
Monkhouse, MaryIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest9%05/01/2023
Perry, ChaseIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest5%01/01/2013
Perry, JaneIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest33%05/01/2023
Diaz, PamelaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/03/2010
Diaz, PamelaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/03/2010
Kothmann, JohnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/27/2022
Kothmann, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/27/2022
Luchenbach, JayIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Luchenbach, JayIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Monkhouse, MaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Perry, ChaseIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Perry, ChaseIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Perry, ChaseIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Perry, JaneIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Perry, JaneIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Perry, JaneIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Avir at Enchanted Rock1.9 miFredericksburg, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Avir at Fredericksburg1.9 miFredericksburg, TX★★★☆☆2/5
Knopp Nursing & Rehab Center INC2.3 miFredericksburg, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Fredericksburg →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 455278.