MichiganJackson

Jackson County Medical Care Facility

524 Lansing Avenue, Jackson, MI 49201 · Jackson County · 194 certified beds · avg 181 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$68,744
Fines, last 3 years
6.03
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 15, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 16, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Dec 7, 2023 · F-0880

The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Jan 5, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 16, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 15, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jan 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jan 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Jan 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Dec 7, 2023▲ H · Actual harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 7, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Dec 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Dec 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Dec 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202361H ▲
202560D
202681G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $68,744, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 15, 2026Payment Denial4 days from Feb 12, 2026
Dec 7, 2023Fine$68,744

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)6.034.323.95top 6% in Michigan; top 4% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.950.840.69top 29% in Michigan; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.483.793.50top 5% in Michigan; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.430.490.48top 49% in Michigan; top 43% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)23.544.145.8top 6% in Michigan; top 5% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)18.439.242.9top 12% in Michigan; top 12% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.37, RN 0.85, weekend 4.88. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Government - County

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Jackson County Medical Care FacilityOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/1967
Markowski, RonaldIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2014
Price, KennyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/20/2022
Shong, JenniferIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/19/1995
Shong, JenniferIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/19/1995
Wilkins, DestinyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Wilkins, DestinyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/30/2025
Wilson, HarryIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Yalavarthi, JyothsnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2015
Yalavarthi, JyothsnaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/30/2025
Youngdahl, ElizabethIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Regency at Jackson0.4 miJackson, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Vista Grande Villa2.1 miJackson, MI★★★★☆3/5
Mission Point Health Campus of Jackson2.8 miJackson, MI★★☆☆☆1/5
Cascade Senior Care Center2.9 miJackson, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Faith Haven Senior Care Centre5.2 miJackson, MI★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Arbor Manor Rehabilitation and Nursing Center7.8 miSpring Arbor, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Chelsea Retirement Community19.8 miChelsea, MI★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Jackson →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235019.