WisconsinBeaver Dam

Hillside Manor

803 S University Ave, Beaver Dam, WI 53916 · Dodge County · 115 certified beds · avg 56 residents/day · certified since Nov 15, 1989

Part of chain: SANFORD HEALTH (4 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$193,352
Fines, last 3 years
4.47
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jul 21, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jul 22, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 12, 2026 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 4, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 14, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 31, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 12, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Mar 12, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 12, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Mar 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Mar 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Mar 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 21, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jul 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. · from a complaint
Jun 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Jun 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Nov 14, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 14, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings.
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Sep 7, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (12 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330E
2024121G ▲
202551J ▲
202691G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $193,352, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 12, 2026Fine$45,220
Jun 24, 2025Fine$148,132
Nov 14, 2024Payment Denial20 days from Dec 11, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityWisconsin avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.474.293.95top 36% in Wisconsin; top 24% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.271.010.69top 21% in Wisconsin; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.833.843.50top 43% in Wisconsin; top 28% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.640.680.48top 48% in Wisconsin; top 20% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)50.046.945.8bottom 42% in Wisconsin; bottom 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)66.739.742.9bottom 11% in Wisconsin; bottom 15% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.88, RN 1.10, weekend 3.32. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Marshfield Clinic Health System INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/01/2019
MCHS Hospitals INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%05/01/2019
SanfordOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2025
Baltus, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/04/2016
Baltus, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/08/2023
Buswell Cleary, LindseyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/02/2023
Buswell Cleary, LindseyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/02/2023
Fernandez, EdwardIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/08/2023
Fernandez, EdwardIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Hoerneman, BrianIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2023
Hoerneman, BrianIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/04/2023
Klebe, SamanthaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/08/2023
Klebe, SamanthaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Klebe, SamanthaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Marshfield Clinic Health System INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2019
Mathison, DouglasIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2020
MCHS Hospitals INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2019
MCHS Hospitals INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2019
McKuen, LaurieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/23/2024
McKuen, LaurieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/23/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Beaver Dam Health Care Center0.2 miBeaver Dam, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Clearview8.1 miJuneau, WI★★★★★4/5
Clearview Brain Injury Center8.1 miJuneau, WI★★★★★5/5
Randolph Health Services10.8 miRandolph, WI★★★☆☆3/5
Columbus Health and Rehab12.9 miColumbus, WI★★☆☆☆2/5
Complete Care at Christian Home LLC13.0 miWaupun, WI★★☆☆☆2/5
Avina of Mayville14.0 miMayville, WI★★★☆☆3/5
Marquardt Memorial Manor18.0 miWatertown, WI★★☆☆☆2/5
Watertown Health Care Center18.4 miWatertown, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Beaver Dam →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 525447.