OklahomaBlackwell

Hillcrest Manor Nursing Center

1210 South 6th Street, Blackwell, OK 74631 · Kay County · 137 certified beds · avg 52 residents/day · certified since Aug 29, 2001

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$46,898
Fines, last 3 years
3.72
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 4, 2025 · F-0657

The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.

Why it matters: Delays or gaps in care planning mean staff may work without a clear, current roadmap for the resident's daily care and treatment.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 1, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 4, 2025 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 30, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 4, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 4, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 4, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint
Apr 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint
Apr 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Apr 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Apr 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Apr 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Apr 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · from a complaint
Apr 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs.
Dec 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts.
Dec 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping.
Dec 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Dec 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 30, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Nov 30, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Nov 30, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Nov 30, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Nov 30, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 30, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 30, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202270E
202350E
202410D
2025112G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $46,898, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 4, 2025Fine$46,898
Apr 4, 2025Payment Denial36 days from May 8, 2025

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.724.583.95bottom 9% in Oklahoma; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.460.410.69top 34% in Oklahoma; bottom 31% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.454.163.50bottom 14% in Oklahoma; top 45% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.270.280.48top 43% in Oklahoma; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.055.545.8
RN turnover (%)0.053.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.96, RN 0.36, weekend 2.74. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Grant Rhodes Revocable TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%01/01/2017
Jeffrey W Young Revocable Trust Dated July 27, 2017Organization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%01/01/2017
Rhodes, JonathanIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest50%01/01/2017
Young, JeffreyIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest50%01/01/2017
Bedlam Properties Ho LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/27/2024
Bedlam Properties Ho LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025
Black Diamond InvestmentsOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/27/2024
Carson, JonathanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/27/2024
Grant Rhodes Revocable TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025
Jeffrey W Young Revocable Trust Dated July 27, 2017OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025
Lietzke, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/27/2024
Lietzke, MarkIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025
Matrix Provider Solutions LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025
Rhodes, JonathanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025
Snow, LarryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2020
Snow, LarryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025
Snow, LarryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025
Spillars, RodgerIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025
Young, JeffreyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Ponca City Nursing & Rehabilitation Center11.7 miPonca City, OK★★★★★5/5
Shawn Manor Nursing Home13.8 miPonca City, OK★★★★★5/5
Bradbury Commons14.8 miPonca City, OK★★★★☆5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Blackwell →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375402.