ColoradoCanon City

Hildebrand Care Center

1401 Phay Ave, Canon City, CO 81212 · Fremont County · 75 certified beds · avg 70 residents/day · certified since Oct 18, 1983

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$15,642
Fines, last 3 years
4.44
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 17, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 6, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (13)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 17, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 28, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately.
Jul 28, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Jul 28, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202230F
202360D
202411J ▲
202530E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $15,642.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 17, 2024Fine$15,642

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityColorado avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.443.893.95top 23% in Colorado; top 25% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.220.860.69top 15% in Colorado; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.893.443.50top 23% in Colorado; top 26% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.780.610.48top 22% in Colorado; top 12% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)48.647.145.8bottom 45% in Colorado; bottom 40% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)57.144.642.9bottom 24% in Colorado; bottom 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.81, RN 1.05, weekend 3.34. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Beaton, KimberlyIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest08/01/2017
Leonard, SharonIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest08/01/2017
Shadow Mountain ManagementOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest11/01/1973
Cory, PhillipIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Hamby, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Lester, DelwinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/31/2018
Shadow Mountain ManagementOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Progressive Care Center0.0 miCanon City, CO★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Skyline Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation Center0.6 miCanon City, CO★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Valley View Care Center0.6 miCanon City, CO★★★☆☆2/5
Canon Lodge Care Center0.6 miCanon City, CO★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Bruce McCandless Co State Veterans Nursing Home8.3 miFlorence, CO★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Canon City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 065179.