Harvard Rest Haven

400 East 7th Street, Harvard, NE 68944 (opens Google Maps) · Clay County · (402) 772-7591· 30 certified beds · avg 24 residents/day · certified since May 1, 2006 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected May 27, 2026

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

5.03

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

May 27, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. F-0552
May 27, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
May 27, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656

View all 13 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
May 27, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552
May 27, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
May 27, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
May 27, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
May 27, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582
May 27, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628
May 27, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
May 27, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
May 27, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · F-0947
Feb 27, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Feb 27, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Feb 27, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758
Feb 15, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 9).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2024

2025

2026

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2024	1	D
2025	3	D
2026	9	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityNebraska averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

5.03

4.33

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

1.00

0.72

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

4.09

3.79

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Nebraska avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	5.03	4.33	3.95	top 19% in Nebraska; top 13% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	1.00	0.72	0.69	top 18% in Nebraska; top 16% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.09	3.79	3.50	top 33% in Nebraska; top 20% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.54	0.47	0.48	top 31% in Nebraska; top 28% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	48.5	48.7	45.8	bottom 47% in Nebraska; bottom 41% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	—	44.1	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.41, RN 0.87, weekend 3.58.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.41 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Harvard Rest Haven. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Government - City

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Becker, Glen	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	08/15/2015
City of Harvard	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	03/10/2015
Ljunggren, Susan	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	08/15/2015
Schulte, Jodi	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	08/15/2015
Sedersten, Kristi	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	05/02/2022
Vancampen, Luana	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	08/15/2022
Becker, Glen	Individual	5% or Greater Security Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	08/15/2015
Becker, Glen	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	03/10/2015
Becker, Glen	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/15/2015
Juhl, Regina	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2022
Juhl, Regina	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2022
Ljunggren, Susan	Individual	5% or Greater Security Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	08/15/2015
Ljunggren, Susan	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	05/02/2022
Ljunggren, Susan	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/15/2015
Ryan, Sharon	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	03/30/2022
Schulte, Jodi	Individual	5% or Greater Security Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	08/15/2015
Schulte, Jodi	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	03/10/2015
Schulte, Jodi	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/15/2015
Sedersten, Kristi	Individual	5% or Greater Security Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	05/02/2022
Sedersten, Kristi	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	03/25/2021

Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
"What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
"Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
"How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 49% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 25 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Sutton Community Home, INC.	12.2 mi	Sutton, NE	★★★☆☆	3/5
Good Samaritan Society - Hastings Village	14.8 mi	Hastings, NE	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Westfield Quality Care of Aurora	17.5 mi	Aurora, NE	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Memorial Community Care	17.8 mi	Aurora, NE	★★★★★	4/5
Legacy Square	18.5 mi	Henderson, NE	★★☆☆☆	1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Harvard →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285272.