TexasStamford

Harmony Care at Stamford

1003 Columbia St, Stamford, TX 79553 · Jones County · 112 certified beds · avg 32 residents/day · certified since Oct 19, 1998

Part of chain: HARMONY CARE GROUP (6 facilities, chain avg rating 1.6★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$36,875
Fines, last 3 years
3.95
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 17, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Jun 17, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jun 17, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule.
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Apr 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Apr 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Apr 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Apr 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Apr 18, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint
Apr 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Mar 13, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Mar 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Nov 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320D
202440F
202580F
202690F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $36,875.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 30, 2025Fine$36,875

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.953.463.95top 16% in Texas; top 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.490.440.69top 27% in Texas; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.793.043.50bottom 38% in Texas; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.310.340.48top 46% in Texas; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)65.655.345.8bottom 24% in Texas; bottom 9% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)83.354.642.9bottom 17% in Texas; bottom 4% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.69, RN 0.46, weekend 2.60. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Frio Hospital DistrictOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/15/2024
Bodansky, HershelIndividual5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2024
Bodansky, HershelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2024
Carpenter, ScottIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Carpenter, ScottIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
DH Stamford Operations, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2024
Elite HC Investors LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2024
Elite HC Investors LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/19/2024
Evangelista, AnitaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2024
Evangelista, AnitaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2024
Heller, YeshayaIndividual5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2024
Heller, YeshayaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/19/2024
Heller, YeshayaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/19/2024
Ruff, MichaelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2024
Stamford Acapella, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2024
Stamford Holdings BH, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2024
Stamford Holdings BH, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/19/2024
Stamford Operating LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2024
Stamford Operating LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/19/2024
Weiss, ChaimIndividual5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Avir at Haskell15.6 miHaskell, TX★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 1 closest →

All facilities in Stamford →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675769.