How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
700 N Spring St, Box 1010-C-Adm Bldg, Caliente, NV 89008 (opens Google Maps) · Lincoln County · (775) 726-3171· 16 certified beds · avg 16 residents/day · certified since Sep 27, 1974 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. F-0640
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Apr 25, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Apr 25, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 25, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| May 2, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| May 2, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| May 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| May 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| May 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 2, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| May 2, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Nevada avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.32 | 4.05 | 3.95 | top 10% in Nevada; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 2.11 | 0.98 | 0.69 | top 5% in Nevada; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.70 | 3.61 | 3.50 | top 10% in Nevada; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.18 | 0.87 | 0.48 | top 22% in Nevada; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 46.2 | 45.1 | 45.8 | bottom 43% in Nevada; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 18.2 | 43.4 | 42.9 | top 3% in Nevada; top 12% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.01, RN 1.59, weekend 3.55.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.01 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Grover C Dils Medical Center SNF. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - Hospital district
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avery, Terry | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2017 |
| Avery, Terry | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2017 |
| Avery, Terry | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2024 |
| Dirks, Sharon | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2019 |
| Dirks, Sharon | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2019 |
| Dirks, Sharon | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2024 |
| Katschke, Richard | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/07/2003 |
| Katschke, Richard | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2024 |
| Lloyd, Arthur | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/07/2015 |
| Lloyd, Arthur | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/07/2017 |
| Lloyd, Arthur | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2024 |
| Mangum, Rozanne | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2019 |
| Mangum, Rozanne | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2019 |
| Mangum, Rozanne | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2024 |
| Miller, Douglas | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2019 |
| Miller, Douglas | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2019 |
| Miller, Douglas | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2024 |
| Rowe, Melissa | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/15/2018 |
| Rowe, Melissa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2024 |
All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
This is the only Medicare-certified nursing home within 40 miles. The nearest other one is Southern Utah Veterans Home - Ivins in Ivins, UT — 55 miles away in a straight line.
Straight-line distance is not travel distance. The road route is longer, and in some regions there is no road. Check the actual journey before ruling this option in or out.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 295026.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details