NebraskaSuperior

Good Samaritan Society - Superior

1710 Idaho Street, Superior, NE 68978 · Nuckolls County · 69 certified beds · avg 32 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1996

Part of chain: GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY (92 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.78
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 10, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 10, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 10, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jul 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough fresh-air ventilation, whether through windows, mechanical systems, or both.
Jul 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Jul 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Jul 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jul 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Jul 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jul 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jul 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jul 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202440E
2025110F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNebraska avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.784.333.95bottom 30% in Nebraska; top 50% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.400.720.69bottom 15% in Nebraska; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.653.793.50bottom 48% in Nebraska; top 35% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.280.470.48bottom 24% in Nebraska; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)22.248.745.8top 2% in Nebraska; top 4% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.044.142.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.57, RN 0.38, weekend 3.45. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Austad, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/25/2019
Bresciani, DeanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/13/2022
Fluit, JoelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2022
Hocks, MatthewIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Koop, ThomasIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/16/2020
Melland, HelenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/22/2021
Middleton, AimeeIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/27/2022
Middleton, AimeeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/27/2022
Morrison, TonyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE02/01/1991
Morrison, TonyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/1991
Norman, LindaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/26/2018
Petersen, ScottIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/09/2018
Rogers, MichaelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/13/2022
Schema, NathanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/24/2019
Schmith, DarrellIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/25/2019
The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan SocietyOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Wooten, ScottIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2024
Wooten, ScottIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Parkview Haven Nursing Home19.5 miDeshler, NE★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 1 closest →

All facilities in Superior →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285187.