MaineFort Kent

Forest Hill Manor

25 Bolduc Ave, Fort Kent, ME 04743 · Aroostook County · 45 certified beds · avg 45 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1994

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$13,627
Fines, last 3 years
4.03
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 16, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 17, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Feb 20, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Feb 20, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 20, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 20, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 20, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 20, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Feb 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Feb 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them.
Feb 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Oct 16, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation. · from a complaint
Sep 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Apr 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 27, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Feb 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Feb 27, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024111J ▲
2025140F
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $13,627.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 16, 2024Fine$13,627

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMaine avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.034.603.95bottom 23% in Maine; top 38% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.351.110.69top 19% in Maine; top 6% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.384.163.50bottom 8% in Maine; top 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.810.730.48top 42% in Maine; top 11% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.046.745.8
RN turnover (%)0.040.242.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.99, RN 1.34, weekend 3.34. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bois, AlainIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/29/2021
Bois, AlainIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/12/2024
Bois, AlainIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/12/2024
Cyr, DouglasIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Cyr, DouglasIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Dionne, GiseleIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2019
Dionne, GiseleIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2019
Ezzy, JohnIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Ezzy, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Fournier, NormanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2021
Fournier, NormanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2021
Gillis, StephanieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Gillis, StephanieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Guimond, DonaldIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/21/2015
Guimond, DonaldIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/21/2015
Harris, JamesIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/20/2023
Harris, JamesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/20/2023
Ouellette, StevenIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2021
Ouellette, StevenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2021
Pelletier, StevenIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
High View Rehabilitation and Living Center14.3 miMadawaska, ME★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 1 closest →

All facilities in Fort Kent →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 205176.