Eventide Prairie Commons Care Center

3490 Ewoldt Street, Grand Island, NE 68803 (opens Google Maps) · Hall County · (308) 321-1122· 36 certified beds · avg 31 residents/day · certified since Apr 12, 2023 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

1/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected May 1, 2025

Serious findings on record

most recent Jun 3, 2026

$10,296

Fines, last 3 years

4.46

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 1, 2025 · F-0678

The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.

Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: May 27, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 3, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jun 25, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Jun 3, 2026G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
May 1, 2025J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated
The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. F-0678
May 1, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. F-0759

View all 16 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jun 3, 2026	▲ G · Actual harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
May 1, 2025	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated	The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · F-0678
May 1, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759
May 1, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
May 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582
May 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Dec 23, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677
Dec 23, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760
May 1, 2024	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803
May 1, 2024	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
May 1, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint · F-0578
May 1, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
May 1, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561
May 1, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
May 1, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
May 1, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 5).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2024

2025

2026

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2024	10	0	F
2025	5	1	J ▲
2026	1	1	G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

1 fine totaling $10,296.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

Date	Type	Amount / length
May 1, 2025	Fine	$10,296

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityNebraska averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

4.46

4.33

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.87

0.72

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

4.22

3.79

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Nebraska avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.46	4.33	3.95	top 41% in Nebraska; top 24% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.87	0.72	0.69	top 29% in Nebraska; top 23% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.22	3.79	3.50	top 27% in Nebraska; top 17% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.81	0.47	0.48	top 9% in Nebraska; top 11% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	67.4	48.7	45.8	bottom 13% in Nebraska; bottom 8% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	85.7	44.1	42.9	bottom 6% in Nebraska; bottom 3% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.41, RN 0.86, weekend 4.17.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.41 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Eventide Prairie Commons Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Eventide Nebraska Senior Living LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	100%	10/10/2024
Tabitha, INC.	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	12/22/2022
Acton, Sherrill	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/22/2024
Bock, Jodee	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/10/2024
Brandt, Terry	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/10/2024
Bye, Robert	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/10/2024
Bye, Robert	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	10/10/2024
Eventide	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/19/2024
Fischbach, Tyler	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/10/2024
Gulbranson, Patrick	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/10/2024
Hervert, Mitchell	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/10/2026
Johnson, Vikki	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/10/2024
Johnson, Vikki	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	10/10/2024
Larson-Casselton, Cindy	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/10/2024
Lee, Judith	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/10/2024
Lunak, Brandon	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/10/2024
Lunak, Brandon	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2026
Ohe, Darin	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/22/2024
Riewer, Jon	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	10/10/2024
Schafer, Eric	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/10/2024

Showing 20 of 24 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 4 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Are staff on every shift trained and certified in CPR, and how do they know each resident's resuscitation wishes?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
"How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
"How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
"What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 67% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 24 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Emerald Nursing & Rehab Lakeview	1.6 mi	Grand Island, NE	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Tiffany Square	2.6 mi	Grand Island, NE	★★☆☆☆	3/5
Good Samaritan Society - Grand Island Village	2.8 mi	Grand Island, NE	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Chi Health St. Francis	2.8 mi	Grand Island, NE	★★★☆☆	4/5
Adept Nursing & Rehab of Grand Island	2.9 mi	Grand Island, NE	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Westfield Quality Care of Aurora	19.2 mi	Aurora, NE	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Memorial Community Care	19.5 mi	Aurora, NE	★★★★★	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Grand Island →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285307.