How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Elwood Care Center
607 Smith Avenue, Elwood, NE 68937 (opens Google Maps) · Gosper County · (308) 785-3302· 43 certified beds · avg 30 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1997 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 6, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.60
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 8 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. F-0552
View all 8 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| May 6, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552 |
| May 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 12, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Mar 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
Inspection trend by year
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNebraska averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.60
Nebraska average: 4.33
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.69
Nebraska average: 0.72
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.20
Nebraska average: 3.79
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Nebraska avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.60 | 4.33 | 3.95 | top 37% in Nebraska; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.69 | top 48% in Nebraska; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.20 | 3.79 | 3.50 | top 28% in Nebraska; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.39 | 0.47 | 0.48 | bottom 48% in Nebraska; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 39.4 | 48.7 | 45.8 | top 33% in Nebraska; top 35% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 20.0 | 44.1 | 42.9 | top 18% in Nebraska; top 13% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.01, RN 0.60, weekend 3.66.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.01 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Elwood Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - City
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Village of Elwood, Nebraska | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 12/01/1972 |
| Holl, Kent | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Koenig, Betty | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2001 |
| Martin, Thomas | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2015 |
| Martin, Thomas | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/1972 |
| Nelson, Mary | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2016 |
| Rath, Steven | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Reiners, Kate | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2008 |
| Reiners, Kate | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2008 |
| Scoville, Kim | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Smith, Shane | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2017 |
| Smith, Shane | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2017 |
| The Village of Elwood, Nebraska | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/1972 |
| The Village of Elwood, Nebraska | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/1972 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 39% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 14 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bertrand Nursing Home | 12.8 mi | Bertrand, NE | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285215.