MontanaClancy

Elkhorn Healthcare and Rehabilitation

474 Hwy 282, Clancy, MT 59634 · Jefferson County · 70 certified beds · avg 65 residents/day · certified since May 23, 1977

Part of chain: EDURO HEALTHCARE (34 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.78
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 10, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 10, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Feb 10, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Feb 10, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 10, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 10, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Feb 10, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Feb 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Feb 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Feb 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Feb 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Feb 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Feb 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 19, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 19, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Dec 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Dec 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 16).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202350E
202450E
2026160F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMontana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.784.823.95bottom 28% in Montana; top 50% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.681.170.69bottom 16% in Montana; top 38% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.294.263.50bottom 31% in Montana; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.230.710.48bottom 1% in Montana; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)41.354.845.8top 17% in Montana; top 40% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)16.748.342.9top 1% in Montana; top 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.73, RN 0.49, weekend 2.38. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bewsey Enterprises LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2020
Bewsey, MichaelIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2020
Eduro Healthcare LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2020
Allred Jackson, P.C.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
Allred Jackson, P.C.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/08/2025
Bewsey, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2020
Butler, ScottIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/27/2023
Butler, ScottIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/27/2023
Caretrust GP LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2020
Caretrust Reit INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2020
Ctr Partnership LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/08/2025
Dodge, JeniferIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/22/2023
Dodge, JeniferIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/22/2023
Ecapital Healthcare CorpOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2020
Ecapital Healthcare CorpOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/08/2025
Eduro Healthcare LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2020
Eduro Healthcare LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2020
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2020
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2020
Horn, JacobIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/31/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Mount Ascension Transitional Care of Cascadia8.9 miHelena, MT★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Cooney Healthcare and Rehabilitation9.1 miHelena, MT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF

Compare this facility with the 2 closest →

All facilities in Clancy →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 275056.