Delta Healthcare & Wellness Center, LP

Name: Delta Healthcare & Wellness Center, LP
Address: 514 NORTH BRIDGE STREET, Visalia, CA, 93291, US
Telephone: 5597328614

514 North Bridge Street, Visalia, CA 93291 · Tulare County · 44 certified beds · avg 40 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1989

Part of chain: CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES (40 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.97

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Aug 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not let a resident or their legal representative see or buy copies of the resident's own records. · from a complaint
Aug 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility required residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits or pay privately as a condition of moving in, or failed to tell residents which types of care it does not provide. Both practices are against the rules. · from a complaint
Aug 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · from a complaint
May 15, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 15, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
May 15, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 15, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings.
May 15, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
May 15, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
May 15, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
May 15, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 15, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 15, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Feb 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Feb 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Feb 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Mar 24, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Mar 24, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Mar 24, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 24, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Mar 24, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Mar 24, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 24, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Mar 24, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 24, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Mar 24, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Mar 24, 2022	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 10).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2022	11	E
2024	5	D
2025	13	F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.97	4.31	3.95	bottom 39% in California; top 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.30	0.61	0.69	bottom 12% in California; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.54	3.90	3.50	bottom 34% in California; top 40% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.29	0.51	0.48	bottom 30% in California; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	0.0	36.7	45.8	—
RN turnover (%)	0.0	38.1	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.33, RN 0.32, weekend 3.87. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Partnership

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Corporate Interface Services LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/18/2024
Corporate Interface Services LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/02/2025
Delta Wellness GP, LLC	Organization	General Partnership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	10/09/2020
Eretz Delta Properties	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/30/2020
Grossman, Stephen	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2025
Grossman, Stephen	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2025
Madrigal, Dario	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/20/2025
Madrigal, Dario	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/20/2025
Rechnitz, Shlomo	Individual	Limited Partnership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	10/09/2020
Rockport Administrative Services, LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2021
Rockport Administrative Services, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/02/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"If I ask for a copy of my family member's records, how quickly will I get them and what does it cost?"
"Do you accept Medicaid from day one, and will you put in writing that no private payment is required as a condition of admission?"
"How do you coordinate hospice care, and can residents stay here while receiving it?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"How do you train staff to treat residents with dignity, and how do you protect residents' personal belongings?"
"How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Kaweah Health Skilled Nursing Center	1.2 mi	Visalia, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Visalia Post Acute	1.2 mi	Visalia, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Sequoia Vista	2.4 mi	Visalia, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Linwood Meadows Care Center	2.9 mi	Visalia, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Westgate Gardens Care Center	3.0 mi	Visalia, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Tulare Healthcare & Wellness Center, LP	8.2 mi	Tulare, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Orchards at Tulare	8.2 mi	Tulare, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Grand Oaks Care	8.3 mi	Tulare, CA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Lindsay Gardens Nursing & Rehabilitation	13.2 mi	Lindsay, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
Dinuba Healthcare	14.7 mi	Dinuba, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
Palm Village Retirement Comm.	19.2 mi	Reedley, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Brighton Post Acute	19.5 mi	Hanford, CA	★★★☆☆	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Visalia →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555354.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Delta Healthcare & Wellness Center, LP

514 North Bridge Street, Visalia, CA 93291 · 5597328614

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 5/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "If I ask for a copy of my family member's records, how quickly will I get them and what does it cost?"
☐ "Do you accept Medicaid from day one, and will you put in writing that no private payment is required as a condition of admission?"
☐ "How do you coordinate hospice care, and can residents stay here while receiving it?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "How do you train staff to treat residents with dignity, and how do you protect residents' personal belongings?"
☐ "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 555354 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)