West VirginiaThomas

Cortland Acres Health and Rehabilitation

39 Cortland Acres Lane, Thomas, WV 26292 · Tucker County · 94 certified beds · avg 90 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1978

Part of chain: HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE (43 facilities, chain avg rating 1.8★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$32,057
Fines, last 3 years
3.04
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Mar 12, 2025 · F-0805

The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.

Why it matters: Food served in the wrong texture can cause choking or lead residents to stop eating and lose weight.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Apr 22, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 12, 2025 · F-0678

The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.

Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Apr 16, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (31)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 25, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Mar 25, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 12, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Mar 12, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Mar 12, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 12, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 12, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 12, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Mar 12, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 12, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Mar 12, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 12, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 12, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Aug 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Aug 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Mar 30, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Mar 30, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 30, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Mar 30, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Mar 30, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 17).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202250E
202350E
2025192K ▲
202620E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $32,057.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 12, 2025Fine$32,057

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityWest Virginia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.043.553.95bottom 31% in West Virginia; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.480.700.69bottom 15% in West Virginia; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.683.073.50bottom 33% in West Virginia; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.310.400.48bottom 42% in West Virginia; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)59.844.145.8bottom 14% in West Virginia; bottom 17% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)68.842.442.9bottom 12% in West Virginia; bottom 12% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.18, RN 0.50, weekend 2.81. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
39 Cortland Acres Ln SNF Estate LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Bennet-Idels, HeatherIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Botwinick, MichaelIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Cortland Acres SNF Operations Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Lieberman, RochelIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
MJL 2024 Family TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Prager, ElishevaIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Sabrina 1818 Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Saessy Irrevocable TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Tatiriq Irrevocable TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
39 Cortland Acres Ln SNF Estate LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Bennet-Idels, HeatherIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Botwinick, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Botwinick, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Cortland Acres SNF Operations Holdings LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Cortland Acres SNF Operations Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2025
Delilah 2626 Holdings LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Delilah 2626 Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2025
DMT Spe I LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
DMT Spe I LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Oakland Nursing & Rehabilitation Center19.0 miOakland, MD★☆☆☆☆1/5
Dennett Rehab Center19.4 miOakland, MD★☆☆☆☆2/5
Garrett County Subacute Unit19.5 miOakland, MD★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Thomas →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 515063.