801 North Washington, Weatherford, OK 73096 (opens Google Maps) · Custer County · (580) 772-3993· 81 certified beds · avg 52 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 2009 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 5, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 10, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, pattern · Jun 24, 2022 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (H): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 8, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. F-0655
The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. F-0552
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 23, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Jan 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552 |
| Jan 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Jan 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Jan 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Oct 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Nov 1, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Nov 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jun 24, 2022 | ▲ H · Actual harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jun 24, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Jun 24, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jun 24, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jun 24, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Jun 24, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 24, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 24, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 8 | 1 | H ▲ |
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 6 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $9,113.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2025 | Fine | $9,113 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Oklahoma avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 6.10 | 4.58 | 3.95 | top 4% in Oklahoma; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.69 | top 47% in Oklahoma; bottom 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.28 | 4.16 | 3.50 | top 7% in Oklahoma; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.22 | 0.28 | 0.48 | bottom 40% in Oklahoma; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | — | 55.5 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 53.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.71, RN 0.30, weekend 4.07.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.71 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Corn Heritage Village and Rehab of Weatherford. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Church related
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
| Aaron, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Aegis Therapies, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/22/2020 |
| Aegis Therapies, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/25/2025 |
| Bartel, Howard | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2013 |
| Citizens Bank of Oklahoma | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Citizens Bank of Oklahoma | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/25/2025 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/17/2002 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/25/2025 |
| Gossen, Bart | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Legacy Bank | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Legacy Bank | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/25/2025 |
| Morgan, Melissa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Onshift INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Onshift INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/25/2025 |
| Peters, Jonathan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/30/2019 |
| Raji, Sheriffdeen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2014 |
| Raji, Sheriffdeen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2014 |
| Redcay, Clair | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/27/2021 |
| Riley, Jennifer | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 26 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 6 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maple Lawn Nursing and Rehabilitation | 6.6 mi | Hydro, OK | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Corn Heritage Village and Rehab | 12.1 mi | Corn, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Clinton Therapy & Living Center | 15.8 mi | Clinton, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| River Valley Skilled Nursing and Therapy | 16.7 mi | Clinton, OK | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375530.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details