MinnesotaCokato

Cokato Manor

182 Sunset Avenue, Cokato, MN 55321 · Wright County · 56 certified beds · avg 52 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1987

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.26
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Apr 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Apr 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Apr 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Apr 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough staff with the right skills to meet the mental and behavioral health needs of its residents, such as those living with dementia or depression.
Apr 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Apr 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Apr 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Feb 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Feb 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Feb 14, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Feb 14, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202450D
2025110E
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.264.833.95bottom 28% in Minnesota; top 30% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.801.220.69bottom 15% in Minnesota; top 27% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.864.273.50bottom 33% in Minnesota; top 27% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.510.690.48bottom 37% in Minnesota; top 32% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)44.242.245.8bottom 39% in Minnesota; top 48% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.038.642.9bottom 32% in Minnesota; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.66, RN 0.69, weekend 3.31. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Anderson, AllanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/20/1990
Bortnem, PeterIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2013
Carlson, JesseIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2021
Carlson, PeggyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/1996
Cates, ShayIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE06/20/2000
Dixon, BrianIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE12/06/2016
Dixon, BrianIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2025
Hanson, StevenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/20/1990
Keith, KateIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Luhman, CindyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2021
Melquist, TreshaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE02/08/2021
Melquist, TreshaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/08/2021
Melquist, TreshaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/08/2021
Melquist, TreshaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2025
Svela, DeanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Lakeside Generations Health Care Center5.1 miDassel, MN★★★★☆4/5
Good Samaritan Society - Howard Lake6.0 miHoward Lake, MN★★★★☆3/5
The Gardens at Winsted LLC10.5 miWinsted, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Annandale Care Center INC13.4 miAnnandale, MN★★★★★5/5
Meeker Manor Rehablitation Center, LLC15.8 miLitchfield, MN★★★☆☆3/5
The Estates at Delano LLC16.1 miDelano, MN★★★★☆4/5
Lake Ridge Care Center of Buffalo, INC.16.7 miBuffalo, MN★★★★☆4/5
Park View Health Care Center16.9 miBuffalo, MN★★★★★5/5
Harmony River Living Center17.1 miHutchinson, MN★★★★☆3/5
Cura of Watkins19.6 miWatkins, MN★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Cokato →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245412.