How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
83825 Highway 9, Ashland, AL 36251 (opens Google Maps) · Clay County · (256) 354-2131· 83 certified beds · avg 71 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1974 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 8 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. F-0679
The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. F-0582
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. F-0686
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Mar 16, 2022 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| May 16, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| May 16, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 21, 2018 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 21, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jun 21, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 21, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (2 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2019 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Alabama avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.39 | 4.43 | 3.95 | bottom 48% in Alabama; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.69 | top 44% in Alabama; top 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.70 | 3.73 | 3.50 | bottom 50% in Alabama; top 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.48 | bottom 48% in Alabama; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 39.7 | 46.9 | 45.8 | top 27% in Alabama; top 35% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 20.0 | 39.5 | 42.9 | top 16% in Alabama; top 13% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.73, RN 0.64, weekend 3.14.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.73 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Clay County Nursing Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Other
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burdette, Gerald | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2009 |
| Carpenter, Julia | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2009 |
| Clay County Healthcare Authority | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1966 |
| Crawford, Cynthia | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2009 |
| Crenshaw, Bobby | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2009 |
| Fetner, Larry | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2009 |
| Glenn, Donna | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2009 |
| Graben, Robin | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/06/2011 |
| Harris, Dwight | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2009 |
| Jackson, Kathy | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2009 |
| Jarmon, Timothy | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2009 |
| Luker, Lennie | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/03/2009 |
| Miller, David | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2009 |
| Perry, Belever | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2009 |
| Smith, Linda | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2009 |
| Tomlin, Kerry | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2009 |
| Wilkinson, Kattie | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/23/2011 |
| Williams, Mary | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2009 |
| Wood, Ben | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2009 |
| Young, Stephen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2021 |
All 20 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineville Health and Rehabilitation, LLC | 4.1 mi | Lineville, AL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Talladega Healthcare Center, INC | 18.6 mi | Talladega, AL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Goodwater Healthcare Center | 19.6 mi | Goodwater, AL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 015124.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details