IllinoisVirginia

Cass County Senior Living & Rehabilitation LLC

530 East Beardstown Street, Virginia, IL 62691 · Cass County · 71 certified beds · avg 28 residents/day · certified since Jan 20, 2006

Part of chain: WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM (18 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.77
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 3, 2026 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 23, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Mar 3, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Mar 3, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Mar 3, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Mar 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Mar 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 21, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Sep 21, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. · from a complaint
Sep 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Jul 28, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jul 28, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 4, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202430F
202570F
2026111G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIllinois avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.772.993.95top 43% in Illinois; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.350.630.69bottom 24% in Illinois; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.662.673.50top 33% in Illinois; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.210.560.48bottom 9% in Illinois; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.044.545.8
RN turnover (%)0.041.842.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.33, RN 0.42, weekend 3.21. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Stout, ScottIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Broster, AliceIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Broster, AliceIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Lindner, LonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Lindner, LonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Pherigo, AshleyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Pherigo, AshleyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Schroeder, JenniferIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Schroeder, JenniferIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Stout, ScottIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Tweedy, MichelleIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Tweedy, MichelleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
White, BryanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
White, BryanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
WLC Management Firm LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
WLC Management Firm LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/21/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Beardstown Health & Rehab Ctr12.2 miBeardstown, IL★★★★☆5/5
Arcadia Care Jacksonville14.0 miJacksonville, IL★☆☆☆☆2/5
Prairie Village Healthcare Ctr14.1 miJacksonville, IL★☆☆☆☆3/5
Jacksonville SKLD Nur & Rehab14.2 miJacksonville, IL★★★★☆4/5
Grove Health & Rehab Ctr, the15.1 miJacksonville, IL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Virginia →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 146100.