MichiganEscanaba

Bishop Noa Home for Senior Citizens

2900 Third Avenue South, Escanaba, MI 49829 · Delta County · 81 certified beds · avg 65 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 2010

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
6.08
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 29, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Apr 29, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Apr 29, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Apr 29, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Apr 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Apr 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Apr 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
May 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 20, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Mar 20, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Dec 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310E
202470F
202560E
202690F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)6.084.323.95top 6% in Michigan; top 4% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.530.840.69top 6% in Michigan; top 4% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.363.793.50top 5% in Michigan; top 4% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.720.490.48top 17% in Michigan; top 15% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.044.145.8
RN turnover (%)0.039.242.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.05, RN 1.27, weekend 4.44. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Other

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Sisters of St. Paul de ChartresOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/1966
Beckon, SusanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Beckon, SusanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Berbohm, KarenIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Berbohm, KarenIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Ferguson, TimothyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2017
Ferguson, TimothyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2017
Lafave, JamieIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2018
Lafave, JamieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2018
Lafave, JamieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/22/2025
Laurin, Mary AnnIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Laurin, Mary AnnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Linder, NicoleIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Linder, NicoleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/22/2025
Schultz, GloriaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/13/2009
Schultz, GloriaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/13/2009
Theoret, RaymondIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/13/2009
Theoret, RaymondIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/13/2009

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Christian Park Village0.4 miEscanaba, MI★★★★★5/5
Christian Park Health Care Center0.4 miEscanaba, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 2 closest →

All facilities in Escanaba →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235651.