MinnesotaWillmar

Bethesda

901 Southeast Willmar Avenue, Willmar, MN 56201 · Kandiyohi County · 248 certified beds · avg 226 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1987

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.65
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 5, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 12, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (19)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings.
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Nov 5, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Nov 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Oct 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Oct 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Oct 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Oct 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
May 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Jan 24, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Jan 24, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jan 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024141G ▲
202550E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.654.833.95top 15% in Minnesota; top 6% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.931.220.69bottom 27% in Minnesota; top 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.084.273.50top 13% in Minnesota; top 6% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.360.690.48bottom 13% in Minnesota; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)36.342.245.8top 38% in Minnesota; top 27% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)21.638.642.9top 20% in Minnesota; top 16% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.75, RN 0.78, weekend 4.26. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Church related

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ahrenholz, RogerIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2019
Behm, MyronIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2017
Blonigan-Christianson, JoanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2019
Dykema, LutherIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Gehant, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021
Gilson, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021
Gjerde, TamalaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/03/2023
Haefner, MichelleIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/03/2008
Johnson, CherylIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2022
Johnson, DeanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021
Krieger, BailleeIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/03/2023
Krieger, BailleeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2025
Kveene, JulieIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Pool, CherylIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2017
Quam, SamuelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2022
Roiseland, AlanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Roiseland, AlanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2025
Strehlow, BettyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2022
Tusha-Mohlin, KarenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Cura of Willmar1.7 miWillmar, MN★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Glenoaks Senior Living Campus14.0 miNew London, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Clara City Care Center19.4 miClara City, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Willmar →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245427.