KansasMontezuma

Bethel Home

300 S Aztec St, Montezuma, KS 67867 · Gray County · 56 certified beds · avg 54 residents/day · certified since Aug 28, 2012

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
6.40
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 1, 2023 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 4, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Aug 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 1, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 1, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Feb 1, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Feb 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Feb 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Feb 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 24, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202110D
202371G ▲
202570E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)6.404.583.95top 8% in Kansas; top 3% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.770.810.69top 43% in Kansas; top 30% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.594.053.50top 8% in Kansas; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.300.490.48bottom 18% in Kansas; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)28.648.145.8top 8% in Kansas; top 12% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)16.742.042.9top 13% in Kansas; top 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.58, RN 0.55, weekend 4.00. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Church related

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ensz, TerryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Isaac, TravisIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Johnson, LanceIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Koehn, BrianIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/13/2018
Koehn, BrianIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/13/2018
Koehn, DonIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Koehn, EugeneIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Koehn, LennisIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Koehn, PresleyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Nickel, BrentonIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Schowengerdt, AndrewIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/01/1991
Schowengerdt, AndrewIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/1991
Schowengerdt, AndrewIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/1991
Smith, JamesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Unruh, BrandonIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Unruh, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Yost, ChrisIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Shepherd's Center16.3 miCimarron, KS★★☆☆☆1/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 1 closest →

All facilities in Montezuma →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175528.