MinnesotaBelgrade

Belgrade Nursing Home

103 School Street, Belgrade, MN 56312 · Stearns County · 34 certified beds · avg 25 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1987

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.75
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (9)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · from a complaint
Jun 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 20, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
Feb 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Feb 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Feb 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Dec 21, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320F
202560F
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.754.833.95bottom 50% in Minnesota; top 18% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.751.220.69bottom 9% in Minnesota; top 32% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.504.273.50top 35% in Minnesota; top 12% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.360.690.48bottom 13% in Minnesota; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)73.542.245.8bottom 5% in Minnesota; bottom 4% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)60.038.642.9bottom 18% in Minnesota; bottom 22% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.58, RN 0.72, weekend 4.34. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Fischer, StephanieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Lemmer, JamesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/19/2006
Lieser, TrudyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/24/2015
Montenegro, RobertIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2021
Westaby, SandraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/26/2002
Winger, AnnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/24/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Glenoaks Senior Living Campus10.4 miNew London, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Cura of Paynesville16.0 miPaynesville, MN★★★★☆4/5
Cura of Melrose18.1 miMelrose, MN★★☆☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Belgrade →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245418.