CaliforniaSouth Lake Tahoe

Barton Hospital D/P SNF

2170 South Avenue, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 · El Dorado County · 48 certified beds · avg 44 residents/day · certified since Apr 4, 1997

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$9,252
Fines, last 3 years
5.31
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 4, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 2, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 29, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 12, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 16, 2026B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 10, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Apr 10, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 10, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 10, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Apr 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Apr 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Apr 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Feb 4, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jun 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 29, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Oct 5, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Oct 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.

Inspection trend by year

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320E
202541G ▲
2026121G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $9,252, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 4, 2026Fine$9,252
Feb 4, 2026Payment Denial3 days from Feb 27, 2026

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.314.313.95top 10% in California; top 9% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.640.610.69top 3% in California; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.753.903.50top 9% in California; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.980.510.48top 8% in California; top 6% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)32.036.745.8top 37% in California; top 18% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)21.438.142.9top 22% in California; top 16% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.34, RN 1.34, weekend 3.88. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Barton Healthcare SystemOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%03/07/1997
Adams, CarlaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2023
Adams, CarlaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2023
Anderson, ShawnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Barton Healthcare SystemOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/04/1997
Barton Healthcare SystemOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/07/1997
Biasotti, KathrynIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2019
Cefalu, JonathonIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Digrande, PeterIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Fry, PatrickIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2020
Killebrew, AbbyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/22/2014
Ledbetter, KirkIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2008
Mlynsky, SherryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2022
Neiger, KellyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/11/2018
Purvance, ClintonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2015
Rahbeck, JeffreyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2017
Schunk, StefanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2018
Weavil, ScottIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Wonnacott, MatthewIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Wonnacott, MatthewIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Gardnerville Health & Rehabilitation Center13.1 miGardnerville, NV★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Mountain View Health and Rehabilitation19.7 miCarson City, NV★★☆☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 2 closest →

All facilities in South Lake Tahoe →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555698.