TexasKingsland

Avir at Kingsland

3727 W Ranch Rd 1431, Kingsland, TX 78639 · Llano County · 122 certified beds · avg 72 residents/day · certified since Aug 10, 2004

Part of chain: AVIR HEALTH GROUP (116 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.90
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 8, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 10, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 28, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
May 28, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
May 28, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
May 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
May 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Apr 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jan 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Jan 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jan 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. · from a complaint
Jan 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide specialized rehabilitation services — like physical, occupational, or speech therapy — by qualified staff when a doctor ordered them for a resident. · from a complaint
Oct 8, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Oct 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Oct 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Mar 13, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jan 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 31, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202440E
202551G ▲
2026110E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.903.463.95bottom 17% in Texas; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.380.440.69bottom 48% in Texas; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.593.043.50bottom 21% in Texas; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.260.340.48bottom 40% in Texas; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)42.555.345.8top 27% in Texas; top 43% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.054.642.9top 41% in Texas; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.67, RN 0.35, weekend 2.39. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Government - Hospital district

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Fannin County Hospital AuthorityOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%10/01/2020
3727 W Ranch Road 1431 Holdings LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
3727 W Ranch Road 1431 Property Owner, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Dagan, AmitaiIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/11/2025
Freund, NochumIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Goldberger, AbrahamIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/11/2025
Goldberger, FaigyIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/11/2025
Ramirez, RobertoIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/09/2023
Ramirez, RobertoIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Sanderson, ClarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Syed, AsifIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Syed, AsifIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Travitsky, AaronIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Welltower NNN Group, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025
Welltower Op, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Brixton at Horseshoe Bay11.2 miHorseshoe Bay, TX★★★★☆4/5
Granite Mesa Health Center12.9 miMarble Falls, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
Llano Nursing and Rehabilitation Center14.4 miLlano, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Avir at Burnet14.5 miBurnet, TX★★★☆☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Kingsland →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676035.