How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Ashland Health and Rehabilitation
16056 Boundry Drive, Ashland, MS 38603 (opens Google Maps) · Benton County · (662) 224-6196· 60 certified beds · avg 54 residents/day · certified since Jun 11, 1991 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: VANGUARD HEALTHCARE (6 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)
5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Apr 15, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.88
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 10 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. F-0558
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint F-0656
View all 10 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Apr 15, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Nov 21, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Nov 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Nov 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (2 → 2).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMississippi averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.88
Mississippi average: 4.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.94
Mississippi average: 0.74
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.03
Mississippi average: 4.09
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Mississippi avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.88 | 4.88 | 3.95 | top 40% in Mississippi; top 15% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.94 | 0.74 | 0.69 | top 17% in Mississippi; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.03 | 4.09 | 3.50 | top 43% in Mississippi; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.49 | 0.38 | 0.48 | top 16% in Mississippi; top 34% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 31.7 | 45.7 | 45.8 | top 13% in Mississippi; top 17% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 18.2 | 38.4 | 42.9 | top 20% in Mississippi; top 12% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.42, RN 0.85, weekend 3.65.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.42 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Ashland Health and Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ervin General Partnership | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/19/2007 |
| Jere Suzanne Ervin Irrv Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/19/2007 |
| Orand LP | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/19/2007 |
| Orand, William | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/19/2007 |
| Vanguard Healthcare, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 12/19/2007 |
| William Jeffrey Ervin Irrv Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/19/2007 |
| Fick, John | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/20/2014 |
| Harrison, Nicola | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/11/2014 |
| Moore, Rhonda | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/05/2024 |
| Moore, Rhonda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/07/2025 |
| North Mississippi Management Associates, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/19/2007 |
| North Mississippi Management Associates, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2025 |
| Orand, William | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/19/2007 |
| Orand, William | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/19/2007 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Vanguard Healthcare — 6 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Aurora Health and Rehabilitation — Columbus, MS · overall 3/5
- Pine Forest Health and Rehabilitation — Jackson, MS · overall 1/5abuse
- Rest Haven Health and Rehabilitation — Ripley, MS · overall 2/5
- Shady Lawn Health and Rehabilitation — Vicksburg, MS · overall 5/5
- Vicksburg Convalescent Center — Vicksburg, MS · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "How do you learn about each resident's background and history, and how does that shape their care?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What is your policy on physical restraints, and what alternatives do you try first?"
- "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 32% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 14 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holly Springs Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 8.3 mi | Holly Springs, MS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Diversicare of Ripley | 13.9 mi | Ripley, MS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Rest Haven Health and Rehabilitation | 13.9 mi | Ripley, MS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Tippah County Nursing Home | 14.1 mi | Ripley, MS | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 255138.