OhioGallipolis

Arbors at Gallipolis

170 Pinecrest Drive, Gallipolis, OH 45631 · Gallia County · 99 certified beds · avg 84 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1978

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: ARBORS AT OHIO (16 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.80
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 29, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 20, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 5, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 26, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 29, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · from a complaint
Apr 21, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
Apr 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign.
Jul 5, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 5, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 5, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Jul 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Jul 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jul 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jul 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jul 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jun 8, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Jun 8, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Jun 8, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Jun 8, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jun 8, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jun 8, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202160E
202381G ▲
202570F
202621G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOhio avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.803.453.95top 21% in Ohio; top 48% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.720.600.69top 23% in Ohio; top 35% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.313.073.50top 25% in Ohio; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.400.420.48top 46% in Ohio; top 48% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)26.848.745.8top 4% in Ohio; top 9% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)8.343.942.9top 4% in Ohio; top 3% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.72, RN 0.70, weekend 3.24. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ark Opco Group, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/01/2015
B&y Healthcare S CorpOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/01/2015
B&y TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/01/2015
Cody Healthcare S CorpOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/01/2015
Craig Flashner 2007 TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/01/2015
Flashner, CraigIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Flashner, CraigIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Kirk, KristineIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2016
Noble Healthcare Management, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Norcross, RobertIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Perlstein, YitzchokIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Perlstein, YitzchokIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Prestige Administrative Services, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Rogers, StaceyIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Abbyshire Place Health and Rehabilitation Center L0.3 miBidwell, OH★★★★★4/5
Holzer Senior Care Center1.1 miBidwell, OH★★★☆☆2/5
Pleasant Valley Healthcare Center7.9 miPoint Pleasant, WV★★★★★5/5
Majestic Care of Lakin12.2 miWest Columbia, WV★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Overbrook Center14.9 miMiddleport, OH★★★☆☆3/5
Ayden Healthcare of Jackson18.3 miJackson, OH★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Gallipolis →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365348.